EDIT: This passage was edited at 9:20am EDT. If you read it prior to this time, please read again. All that was changed was some of my cynicism was removed.
I am sure you have heard the buzz about Dr. James Dobson speaking out against Senator Barack Obama’s comments given in a speech in 2006 to an evangelical group. If you haven’t here’s a link with all the buzz. I am not sure how long that link will be good so if you are not reading this within a period of a couple weeks of the post, the link may not be good.
I need to speak up now and say that I mostly agreed with Dr. Dobson. However his comment that “Obama should not be referencing antiquated dietary codes and passages from the Old Testament that are no longer relevant to the teachings of the New Testament.” is treading a thin line that I feel the church has traditionally taught incorrectly.
In all fairness to Dr. Dobson, I don’t know what he meant by that comment. But my guess is probably accurate that he agrees with most evangelicals when he says that God declared unclean animals are now clean foods. I am sorry to say that I disagree with this 100%. Also the term antiquated in referring to passages from the Old Testament is extremely dangerous too.
Oh how I wish I had time to go over it all. Let me hit the highlights. God never changes. People change, but God doesn’t change. If God were to repeal his laws, He would have said “NO LONGER DO YOU OBEY THIS COMMANDMENT” or something clear like that. To get from teachings in the new testament that God said eating shellfish or pork is acceptable takes a lot of squeezing of the lemon. It’s just not there. So what then can we say about Romans 14? Some say that Paul says we can eat whatever we want. No, Paul says don’t judge someone based on what he or she eats. I don’t eat pork, don’t call me Jewish because of it and I won’t call you a heathen for eating it. The anatomy of a pig, created by God, along with snakes, rats, bats, vultures, dogs, rabbits, raccoons, cats, and other non food animals is such that they should not be consumed by humans. God didn’t change the anatomy of a pig. He declared it unclean and never made it clean. This uncleanliness is not ceremonial in respect to what Christ’s sacrifice did for our lives. It is unclean in regards to being not something we should eat. Just like we shouldn’t eat wood or metal. It’s just not good for us.
Mark 7:19 is a common passage used for those that declare God changed. If you want to eat it, I will not judge you for this. That’s a matter of faith for you and I won’t stand in your way, however I do not feel that the Bible indicates that Jesus declared all foods clean. All foods were already clean so whomever added that passage to the original manuscript must not have realized this. (If you check your Bible, you should be able to determine that this passage was not in the original transcripts) Pork was never food. By definition food is clean. Let’s look at Leviticus 11 now. God is speaking of what can be eaten and also speaking about ceremonial cleanliness which was a shadow of Christ’s cleanliness for sacrifice that was to come. There are two different thoughts being carried on here. What we can eat and what makes us ceremonial clean or unclean. Now Jesus reminded us that we are clean if we have faith in Him, we no longer need to worry about being unclean, but Jesus never said pork and shellfish are clean now.
I have often heard some Christians suggest that Peter’s vision in Acts 10 can be interpreted to suggest that God was telling him all animals can be eaten. I believe in context, God was declaring to Peter that the Gentiles have been declared clean through Christ’s sacrifice as were the Jews. I don’t believe this is suggesting that it is a good idea to eat a rat or a snake.
But all I ask of you or Mr. Dobson or anyone that is a brother or sister of mine in Christ, please consider what God was telling us and try to not consider church tradition in determining what you eat. Church tradition doesn’t necessarily mean God’s true intentions.
Please just consider it. I may be wrong, but I may be right.